<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Last Five Kilometers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/</link>
	<description>Aiming for space through all the hazards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: prasanna</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator>prasanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-630</guid>
		<description>What is the exact kms calculated from earth to loose gravity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the exact kms calculated from earth to loose gravity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Schneeweis</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-542</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Schneeweis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-542</guid>
		<description>Sorry...I will always remain biased for the reliability of the Apollo Earth Landing System...it was the most heavily engineered recovery system ever designed. I was so enamored, acquired one of them for my collection - see http://www.spaceaholic.com/us_artifacts.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230;I will always remain biased for the reliability of the Apollo Earth Landing System&#8230;it was the most heavily engineered recovery system ever designed. I was so enamored, acquired one of them for my collection &#8211; see <a href="http://www.spaceaholic.com/us_artifacts.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.spaceaholic.com/us_artifacts.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthwalker</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>truthwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-216</guid>
		<description>So I did some more reading parasails rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I did some more reading parasails rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravityloss</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>gravityloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 16:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-211</guid>
		<description>Well, the premise here which I didn&#039;t lay out clearly, was to reduce the cost and trouble of returning to earth. If you need to deploy a helicopter ship to fish out capsules well in advance of the landing, that is both costly and inflexible.

It&#039;s not about the prestige.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the premise here which I didn&#8217;t lay out clearly, was to reduce the cost and trouble of returning to earth. If you need to deploy a helicopter ship to fish out capsules well in advance of the landing, that is both costly and inflexible.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about the prestige.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truthwalker</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>truthwalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 23:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I have to disagree a bit with the idea that there is something wrong with ablative heat shields and water landings.  If its stupid and it works, its not stupid.  In fact, I think the very complaint against it reveals the great problem with having NASA explore space: it&#039;s not their money they&#039;re spending.
A (successful) for-profit enterprise would not worry to much about if something was prestigious, only if it brought back greater return than its cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to disagree a bit with the idea that there is something wrong with ablative heat shields and water landings.  If its stupid and it works, its not stupid.  In fact, I think the very complaint against it reveals the great problem with having NASA explore space: it&#8217;s not their money they&#8217;re spending.<br />
A (successful) for-profit enterprise would not worry to much about if something was prestigious, only if it brought back greater return than its cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravityloss</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>gravityloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 11:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Yeah thanks Erik for the links. 
I guess my wording wasn&#039;t very clear about the Gemini paraglider. It was indeed researched and developed to a point but was scrapped.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah thanks Erik for the links.<br />
I guess my wording wasn&#8217;t very clear about the Gemini paraglider. It was indeed researched and developed to a point but was scrapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravityloss</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>gravityloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 09:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Gaetano, that is one option that I&#039;ve thought of too. You could have very long flight range with it. But I actually think it&#039;s not necessary for the capsule, and the engines are heavy too to haul to the moon and back.

But it could be used for recovering a rocket stage. There you aren&#039;t as weight-limited and need a lot of range.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Gaetano, that is one option that I&#8217;ve thought of too. You could have very long flight range with it. But I actually think it&#8217;s not necessary for the capsule, and the engines are heavy too to haul to the moon and back.</p>
<p>But it could be used for recovering a rocket stage. There you aren&#8217;t as weight-limited and need a lot of range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaetano marano</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>gaetano marano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 20:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-200</guid>
		<description>.

I suggest a (parachutes + propellers) Orion&#039;s LAKE landing:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>I suggest a (parachutes + propellers) Orion&#8217;s LAKE landing:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/030orionlakelanding.html</a></p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/05/09/the-last-five-kilometers/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Actually, NASA did (have someone) study paraglider systems during the Gemini program, getting to the towed model stage. I&#039;m not sure why it got cancelled, but cost, time and the decision to keep water-landing probably had something to do with it.

Some reading:
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemlider.htm
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemglide.htm (developmental diary)
http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/387

Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, NASA did (have someone) study paraglider systems during the Gemini program, getting to the towed model stage. I&#8217;m not sure why it got cancelled, but cost, time and the decision to keep water-landing probably had something to do with it.</p>
<p>Some reading:<br />
<a href="http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemlider.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemlider.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemglide.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.astronautix.com/craft/gemglide.htm</a> (developmental diary)<br />
<a href="http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/387" rel="nofollow">http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/22/2/387</a></p>
<p>Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
