<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Gravity Loss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s when we start working together that the real healing takes place, ... It&#039;s when we start spilling our sweat, and not our blood.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Energy and Calories by crf</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/energy-and-calories/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>crf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=625#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Rob,
You can&#039;t claim to have low calories and high energy.

The trick may work because many people don&#039;t understand that calories are a measure of energy.

And many consumers would also fervently deny that their body doesn&#039;t care what form food energy comes in. They would instead explain that the normal kind of energy found in food is probably broken down further into good and bad kinds (fat=bad energy, complex carbs=good energy, &quot;nutrient dense&quot;=good, etc).

Also many people may think food has two types of energy: Vitalism-style stuff that makes you feel &quot;energized&quot; (like caffeine, maybe, or vitamins), and energy (normal kind, measured in calories or joules).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,<br />
You can&#8217;t claim to have low calories and high energy.</p>
<p>The trick may work because many people don&#8217;t understand that calories are a measure of energy.</p>
<p>And many consumers would also fervently deny that their body doesn&#8217;t care what form food energy comes in. They would instead explain that the normal kind of energy found in food is probably broken down further into good and bad kinds (fat=bad energy, complex carbs=good energy, &#8220;nutrient dense&#8221;=good, etc).</p>
<p>Also many people may think food has two types of energy: Vitalism-style stuff that makes you feel &#8220;energized&#8221; (like caffeine, maybe, or vitamins), and energy (normal kind, measured in calories or joules).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Energy and Calories by Rob</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/energy-and-calories/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=625#comment-707</guid>
		<description>I miss your point completely. Hydrive is rating their beverage in the same manner as every other food and drink maker as nearly as I can see. If they said 125,520 joules per bottle, few potential purchasers would have a clue. Maybe your point is that they claim to &quot;give you energy&quot; when low calories means low energy when taken literally, but considering that a bottle has 145 milligrams (or .000145 kilograms) of caffeine among other CNS stimulants, I&#039;m sure they&#039;d state that they&#039;re referring to increasing metabolic rate.

What am I missing here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I miss your point completely. Hydrive is rating their beverage in the same manner as every other food and drink maker as nearly as I can see. If they said 125,520 joules per bottle, few potential purchasers would have a clue. Maybe your point is that they claim to &#8220;give you energy&#8221; when low calories means low energy when taken literally, but considering that a bottle has 145 milligrams (or .000145 kilograms) of caffeine among other CNS stimulants, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d state that they&#8217;re referring to increasing metabolic rate.</p>
<p>What am I missing here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera and Firefox with WordPress on Ubuntu by gravityloss</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/opera-and-firefox-with-wordpress-on-ubuntu/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>gravityloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=617#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Thanks... I tried reinstalling Opera (there&#039;s a different download for Ubuntu 9.10, though the filename is the same and the size to the byte as well...

Now uploading works for some reason. Maybe it was a bug on Wordpress&#039; end? I&#039;m heavily leaning on that. It even mangled the png into something almost unreadable. That damned &quot;crunching&quot;.

It&#039;s probably some font issue in Firefox - the edit window uses something that is not well behaving in Ubuntu Gnome. Probably smoothing yes. I have a crappy onboard Intel 3D accelerator and upgrading to 9.10 solved many opengl garbling problems in at least two applications so in that sense it&#039;s a big win.
On the other hand some software seems a bit slower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks&#8230; I tried reinstalling Opera (there&#8217;s a different download for Ubuntu 9.10, though the filename is the same and the size to the byte as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Now uploading works for some reason. Maybe it was a bug on WordPress&#8217; end? I&#8217;m heavily leaning on that. It even mangled the png into something almost unreadable. That damned &#8220;crunching&#8221;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably some font issue in Firefox &#8211; the edit window uses something that is not well behaving in Ubuntu Gnome. Probably smoothing yes. I have a crappy onboard Intel 3D accelerator and upgrading to 9.10 solved many opengl garbling problems in at least two applications so in that sense it&#8217;s a big win.<br />
On the other hand some software seems a bit slower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypersonic Cruise for the V Prize by Mike Lorrey</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/hypersonic-cruise-for-the-v-prize/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lorrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 04:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/hypersonic-cruise-for-the-v-prize/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Yes Randy, it was the ASALM, not the BOMARC, that hit mach 5.5 with a stuck throttle, but they both used the exact same Marquardt fixed inlet ramjet, in fact they basically ripped some ramjets off mothballed BOMARCs to engine the ASALM for the test program.

To make a ramjet work up to mach 8, you essentially need the inlet, combustor, and exhaust to use active cooling or some high temp materials like hafnium diboride (SHARP materials). You need inlet and exhaust to have variable geometry (not hard either), and you should use LOX based MIPCC. I prefer a design that cools the inlet with LOX and bleeds excess LOX into the airstream to cool and condense it at high speeds.

I would suggest a small rocket motor in addition to the ramjet, once you reach mach 6-7, I&#039;d light the rocket and drop the ramjet (ramjets are simple, cheap, and easily mass produced) to get some ballistic boost, then skip glide the rest of the way to Britain. I built such a design in X-Plane simulator that could be skipped all the way around the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Randy, it was the ASALM, not the BOMARC, that hit mach 5.5 with a stuck throttle, but they both used the exact same Marquardt fixed inlet ramjet, in fact they basically ripped some ramjets off mothballed BOMARCs to engine the ASALM for the test program.</p>
<p>To make a ramjet work up to mach 8, you essentially need the inlet, combustor, and exhaust to use active cooling or some high temp materials like hafnium diboride (SHARP materials). You need inlet and exhaust to have variable geometry (not hard either), and you should use LOX based MIPCC. I prefer a design that cools the inlet with LOX and bleeds excess LOX into the airstream to cool and condense it at high speeds.</p>
<p>I would suggest a small rocket motor in addition to the ramjet, once you reach mach 6-7, I&#8217;d light the rocket and drop the ramjet (ramjets are simple, cheap, and easily mass produced) to get some ballistic boost, then skip glide the rest of the way to Britain. I built such a design in X-Plane simulator that could be skipped all the way around the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Opera and Firefox with WordPress on Ubuntu by Habitat Hermit</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/opera-and-firefox-with-wordpress-on-ubuntu/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Habitat Hermit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 21:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=617#comment-703</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m about to (i.e. perhaps within a month depending on whenever I get around to it --I&#039;m easily distracted lol) install Opera on my new computer (running Ubuntu 9.04 i386, not going to bother with 9.10 yet) and happened to notice a familiar-looking url among the results of the first page! It&#039;s a small world ^_^

A long shot but is the Wordpress editing in any way reliant upon Java? Just asking as I&#039;ve noticed Java (Sun version, haven&#039;t tried IcedTea or whatever the f/oss alternative is called now) operations becoming increasingly (and ridiculously) slow on Xubuntu and Ubuntu during the last distributions. IIRC there have been found issues (some Java math operations I think it was) that have fixes but there&#039;s probably more.

If that&#039;s not related I wonder which Firefox and Opera version (not just version number but also static vs. dynamic for Opera) you&#039;re using and how you installed Opera. Just before starting on this comment I found these two following pages that were of interest and which gives some information about these things with Opera. One of them seems to have tweaks that might be appropriate for your Opera issues on Ubuntu (Gnome desktop environment). Hopefully you might find something of help (they&#039;re recently created or updated too):
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OperaBrowser
http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-install-opera-web-browser-in-ubuntu-including-flashjava-plugins.html

Very strange that a png format image is making trouble in open source programs, it absolutely shouldn&#039;t.

As for text being hard to read, do you experience that only within the Wordpress editor? If it&#039;s a general issue it might well be anti-aliasing issues within Ubuntu or Firefox/Opera or both (I&#039;ve had anti-aliasing issues in old versions of Xubuntu before) or possibly compiz/beryl/stuff (I don&#039;t know much about those programs yet, been a long time since I last used Gnome and those aren&#039;t high on my list of things to get familiar with/sort out).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about to (i.e. perhaps within a month depending on whenever I get around to it &#8211;I&#8217;m easily distracted lol) install Opera on my new computer (running Ubuntu 9.04 i386, not going to bother with 9.10 yet) and happened to notice a familiar-looking url among the results of the first page! It&#8217;s a small world ^_^</p>
<p>A long shot but is the WordPress editing in any way reliant upon Java? Just asking as I&#8217;ve noticed Java (Sun version, haven&#8217;t tried IcedTea or whatever the f/oss alternative is called now) operations becoming increasingly (and ridiculously) slow on Xubuntu and Ubuntu during the last distributions. IIRC there have been found issues (some Java math operations I think it was) that have fixes but there&#8217;s probably more.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s not related I wonder which Firefox and Opera version (not just version number but also static vs. dynamic for Opera) you&#8217;re using and how you installed Opera. Just before starting on this comment I found these two following pages that were of interest and which gives some information about these things with Opera. One of them seems to have tweaks that might be appropriate for your Opera issues on Ubuntu (Gnome desktop environment). Hopefully you might find something of help (they&#8217;re recently created or updated too):<br />
<a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OperaBrowser" rel="nofollow">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OperaBrowser</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-install-opera-web-browser-in-ubuntu-including-flashjava-plugins.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-to-install-opera-web-browser-in-ubuntu-including-flashjava-plugins.html</a></p>
<p>Very strange that a png format image is making trouble in open source programs, it absolutely shouldn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As for text being hard to read, do you experience that only within the WordPress editor? If it&#8217;s a general issue it might well be anti-aliasing issues within Ubuntu or Firefox/Opera or both (I&#8217;ve had anti-aliasing issues in old versions of Xubuntu before) or possibly compiz/beryl/stuff (I don&#8217;t know much about those programs yet, been a long time since I last used Gnome and those aren&#8217;t high on my list of things to get familiar with/sort out).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hypersonic Cruise for the V Prize by randy campbell</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/hypersonic-cruise-for-the-v-prize/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>randy campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/01/23/hypersonic-cruise-for-the-v-prize/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>4751 ADSM Florida wrote:
&gt;Randy, spent a few years in the Florida Panhandle
&gt;working with Vitreo and USAF, in uniform, on the Bomarc
&gt;A and B bird. Primarly in the telemetry side of the house.

I hear that :)
My first assignment in the USAF was Eglin, test side in 1980. (Munitions :)
I got lucky a couple of times on-the-job and got to look over some of the Bomarc launch sites and other missile test stands that are (or were) still in-place. Everyone always seemed to &quot;take-it-in-stride&quot; while I was always struck by the fact I was walking through history.

&gt;Ramjets: I was not aware of the runaway Ramjet, it
&gt;may have happened after I departed.

That seems to be what EVERYONE says about this story ;)
Heck I got more information, easier about the SNARK test launch site than I could get about most of the BOMARC program. (Including a look at the launch site for the SNARK we &quot;lost&quot; when the bird had a total communications failure and ended up flying down into South America before it ran out of fuel and crashed :)
{Google search: &quot;The Day They Lost A Snark&quot;}

&gt;We routinely sent a dmg to blow the bird after the
&gt;mission.

&quot;dmg&quot;? Destruct signal? My Acronym-Fu is not what it used to be ;)

&gt;The thumbnail tuning for that point in history was the
&gt;Ramjets could take a frame to MACH 10. We knew when
&gt;and what would fail before it reached 10.

Thanks, that jibes with information I&#039;ve been able to get ahold of saying that in most cases the ramjets were capable of more thrust and acceleration than the air-frames of the day could handle.

Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4751 ADSM Florida wrote:<br />
&gt;Randy, spent a few years in the Florida Panhandle<br />
&gt;working with Vitreo and USAF, in uniform, on the Bomarc<br />
&gt;A and B bird. Primarly in the telemetry side of the house.</p>
<p>I hear that <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
My first assignment in the USAF was Eglin, test side in 1980. (Munitions <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I got lucky a couple of times on-the-job and got to look over some of the Bomarc launch sites and other missile test stands that are (or were) still in-place. Everyone always seemed to &#8220;take-it-in-stride&#8221; while I was always struck by the fact I was walking through history.</p>
<p>&gt;Ramjets: I was not aware of the runaway Ramjet, it<br />
&gt;may have happened after I departed.</p>
<p>That seems to be what EVERYONE says about this story <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Heck I got more information, easier about the SNARK test launch site than I could get about most of the BOMARC program. (Including a look at the launch site for the SNARK we &#8220;lost&#8221; when the bird had a total communications failure and ended up flying down into South America before it ran out of fuel and crashed <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
{Google search: &#8220;The Day They Lost A Snark&#8221;}</p>
<p>&gt;We routinely sent a dmg to blow the bird after the<br />
&gt;mission.</p>
<p>&#8220;dmg&#8221;? Destruct signal? My Acronym-Fu is not what it used to be <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&gt;The thumbnail tuning for that point in history was the<br />
&gt;Ramjets could take a frame to MACH 10. We knew when<br />
&gt;and what would fail before it reached 10.</p>
<p>Thanks, that jibes with information I&#8217;ve been able to get ahold of saying that in most cases the ramjets were capable of more thrust and acceleration than the air-frames of the day could handle.</p>
<p>Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Less Posting for a While by ChubakaAlm</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/less-posting-for-a-while/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>ChubakaAlm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=94#comment-695</guid>
		<description>Вам не кажется, сколько этот торжество с завуалированным названием придумали себе единоросы?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Вам не кажется, сколько этот торжество с завуалированным названием придумали себе единоросы?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lies, lies, lies by StephenR</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/lies-lies-lies/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>StephenR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=579#comment-690</guid>
		<description>Heh outstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NK-33 by gravityloss</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/nk-33/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>gravityloss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 08:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=572#comment-687</guid>
		<description>I get 1402 m/s delta vee (gravity loss is subtracted) from the mass ratio and v_ex, that would mean only 170 m/s drag loss, it seems quite small to me!

If drag loss delta vee is very roughly inversely proportional to length, for the 110 m Saturn V it was 40 m/s, the 40 m Atlas I it was 120 m/s and for a 10 m rocket it should be 360 to 400 m/s.... This is of course a very very ugly simplification assuming constant configuration / shape (but proportion changes are allowed) and density but anyway...

The transonic c_d is quite large, John Carmack approximated it by just looking at the V-2 experimental data from Sutton.

Maybe you are right anyway.

Have to build a simulator again some day, had one written in Python on a memory stick that of course broke down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get 1402 m/s delta vee (gravity loss is subtracted) from the mass ratio and v_ex, that would mean only 170 m/s drag loss, it seems quite small to me!</p>
<p>If drag loss delta vee is very roughly inversely proportional to length, for the 110 m Saturn V it was 40 m/s, the 40 m Atlas I it was 120 m/s and for a 10 m rocket it should be 360 to 400 m/s&#8230;. This is of course a very very ugly simplification assuming constant configuration / shape (but proportion changes are allowed) and density but anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>The transonic c_d is quite large, John Carmack approximated it by just looking at the V-2 experimental data from Sutton.</p>
<p>Maybe you are right anyway.</p>
<p>Have to build a simulator again some day, had one written in Python on a memory stick that of course broke down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NK-33 by Charles Pooley</title>
		<link>http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/2009/10/03/nk-33/#comment-686</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Pooley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gravityloss.wordpress.com/?p=572#comment-686</guid>
		<description>Drag loss:  the calculations were done by a spreadsheet based program that computes net acceleration with the drag on a step by step basis, without separately calculating the drag soss separately.  You can estimate it by assuming an average Isp of 240 (it&#039;s near the 220 sea level value only briefly) and the mass ratio of 2.5, then subtract the gravity loss during the burn (77 sec for T/W = 2; 66 sec for T/W = 3.

I&#039;ve never considered it important to see that figure separately, rather the estimate of performance.  This will be verified in a number of test flights of 1st stage only, using the US amateur rocket regulations.  The Reynolds number is in the calculation.

In any case, for rockets this small, the first stage is mainly to get the 2 upper stages to a vacuum, and nearly all the flight velocity is developed by the horizontal component of the upper stage thrust.

In a vacuum, rockets of 10-100 N thrust are nearly as efficient as larger ones.

The math has been checked enough for there to be confidence, so the next steps are to gather the means to build--the &quot;Location-1 through 3&quot; as mentioned in the N Prize presentation in the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drag loss:  the calculations were done by a spreadsheet based program that computes net acceleration with the drag on a step by step basis, without separately calculating the drag soss separately.  You can estimate it by assuming an average Isp of 240 (it&#8217;s near the 220 sea level value only briefly) and the mass ratio of 2.5, then subtract the gravity loss during the burn (77 sec for T/W = 2; 66 sec for T/W = 3.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never considered it important to see that figure separately, rather the estimate of performance.  This will be verified in a number of test flights of 1st stage only, using the US amateur rocket regulations.  The Reynolds number is in the calculation.</p>
<p>In any case, for rockets this small, the first stage is mainly to get the 2 upper stages to a vacuum, and nearly all the flight velocity is developed by the horizontal component of the upper stage thrust.</p>
<p>In a vacuum, rockets of 10-100 N thrust are nearly as efficient as larger ones.</p>
<p>The math has been checked enough for there to be confidence, so the next steps are to gather the means to build&#8211;the &#8220;Location-1 through 3&#8243; as mentioned in the N Prize presentation in the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
